The Resistance

“To The Resistance, CPD is complicit by proximity. To the feds, they are cowardly and disloyal. To Herrera, they are simply lost in the middle — trying to keep a fragile peace while the world fractures around them.”

Chicago, 2030

Chicago PD Captain Luis Herrera stood at his office window as dawn crept over the city. Below him, Chicago hummed with that strange new energy of the late 2020s — anxious, watchful, divided. Once, his district’s nights had been filled with bar fights and traffic stops. Now, everything feels like a stage. Every move he makes might stream live before he can even file a report. Every camera could be a jury.

He remembers when policing was local, human, and physical. Now, it’s part of a national argument about loyalty and law — one that no one seems to be winning.

The Rise of The Resistance

The Resistance began as a whisper in 2024 — a coalition of activists, students, clergy, and immigration advocates who vowed to stand between federal agents and immigrant families. At first, they were careful – and peaceful. They organized marches, built networks of legal observers, and held vigils outside detention centers. Their name was deliberate: a tribute to the French Resistance that had fought tyranny in World War II. They saw themselves as moral successors, standing up to what they called “a new machinery of oppression.”

But every movement carries a fracture line.

By 2026, anger began to outpace discipline. Younger, more volatile recruits joined — people who had grown up online, radicalized by a steady diet of injustice and spectacle. They no longer saw protest as enough. They began targeting ICE infrastructure directly: setting small fires at contractor depots, sabotaging surveillance vehicles, and jamming drone signals over federal staging areas.

When a Resistance splinter group calling itself “The Third Front of The Resistance” detonated an improvised explosive device under an ICE transport truck outside Joliet, killing two federal agents, the city’s fear metastasized into something darker. The Resistance denied involvement, but no one believed them. From that night on, their image split in two: freedom fighters to some, domestic terrorists to others.

The federal government answered with escalation. ICE began deploying armored support vehicles in major cities and partnering with active-duty US Marines and National Guard units. The President authorized limited active-duty technical assistance, arguing it was “non-enforcement in nature.” The Supreme Court had yet to rule on whether such deployments violated the Posse Comitatus Act. But by 2030, the lines between military and police, enforcement and protection, were blurred beyond recognition.

For local police like Herrera and his officers, the tension was unbearable. Under Illinois law and the city’s non-cooperation ordinance, CPD was prohibited from assisting in civil immigration enforcement. The courts had reaffirmed the anti-commandeering doctrine — the federal government could not compel state or local agencies to do its bidding. Yet the unwritten rule of policing — that you always help another badge at-risk — refused to die. It is an indelible part of the policing culture.

The Raid

On a humid afternoon in August 2030, Herrera received the call: In three days, ICE planed to raid a South Side apartment complex believed to house multiple undocumented aliens and several Resistance organizers linked to prior ambushes of ICE agents. The operation would target the entire complex. ICE requested CPD assistance “for traffic control and safety.” Herrera knew what that meant: they want a buffer, and they want legitimacy.

The CPD Superintendent agreed to the deployment of CPD units two blocks out — life safety only, no participation in enforcement. The lawyers in City Hall insisted on that phrase. Herrera repeated it until it felt like a prayer he didn’t believe in.

By the time he reached the forward command post, ICE has already established their perimeter. Their vehicles were angular and dark, edges lit with blue IR identifiers invisible to the naked eye but blazing on his AR visor. Overhead, drones loiter in silent patterns, part of ICE’s new integrated overwatch system. Each fed data to an AI copilot that summarizes operations in real time and shares with the CPD — an accountability measure designed to rebuild local policing trust in the Feds. Nearby, a cluster of federal observers monitored the raid through multi-domain coordination channels — live feeds linking military, immigration, and intelligence networks in a tangle of jurisdictions so complex that no one on scene seems entirely sure who’s actually in command.

Herrera’s own LLM dashboard displayed that feed, pulsing data in soft blue. Crowd activity. Social sentiment spikes. Unregistered drone traffic climbing fast. The algorithm could sense what he knew in his bones: The Resistance was coming.

The Ambush

Word of the impending raid doesn’t reach The Resistance by accident.

For months, they’ve been cultivating inside sources — city employees sympathetic to their cause, low-level contractors at telecom firms, even a few federal clerks who leak operational chatter in exchange for cryptocurrency or in support of the movement. Every time ICE moves, the movement’s encrypted network lights up seconds later with whispers and coordinates.

Herrera knew it was happening but they couldn’t prove who’s feeding them. The city’s own digital forensics unit had traced some alerts to compromised police scanners and hacked scheduling systems. Others came from within: someone in a municipal IT department, perhaps, or a clerk with remote access to warrant timestamps. The Resistance calls it “the mirror” — a patchwork surveillance network that lets them see through the cracks of government secrecy.

That’s why, even before ICE stacks on the door, the neighborhood was stirring. Phones buzz, encrypted group chats fill with instructions, and masked volunteers start converging from alleys and side streets. By the time the first flash bang pops, The Resistance was already waiting.

It started subtly. A pulse of network interference — a tremor across the spectrum that made camera feeds stutter. Then, the street began to fill: masked figures blending into a gathering of chanting residents. Hand-lettered banners rose, then smoke.

Herrera felt the shift — that subtle change in noise that precedes violence. The chant’s rhythm tightens; the crowd’s edges ripple forward.

From the northeast corner, a van screeched to a stop. The side door slamed open. Figures in dark clothing poured out, each carrying something — improvised shields, smoke canisters, poles. Someone hurled a drone into the air; another released a small black device that emitted a high-pitched crack.

The ICE team moved instinctively — forming a defensive wedge toward the stairwell entrance. Their body armor flashed with the green light of their AR visors as each agent’s field of vision fills with alerts: motion pings, voice commands, weapon IDs.

Then a single flash — bright, close, and too fast to classify. A noise followed, not one sound but several at once: the metallic crack of gunfire, the hiss of a smoke canister, the electric shriek of a drone losing altitude. The hallway became a storm of echoes.

Herrera saw it first on the overlay — red thermal tags blinking where the door meets the wall. One down near the entry, another crouched behind a rolling trash bin used as a barricade. It’s impossible to tell who fired first. The algorithms on his visor started spitting contradictory readings — “Projectile trajectory unknown… Unknown hostile… Unknown civilian.”

He heard the shot only after he’s already seen it. A second later, a scream cuts through the channel. A chaotic mix of shouts followed — “Officer hit. Officer down!” “They’re flanking left!” “Kid in the hall!” The words collide, fragmented, distorted through the comms static. Herrera’s chest tightened. For one frozen instant, he didn’t know whether to give an order or a prayer.

“Move! Extract the injured!” he finally shouted, pushing past the nearest cruiser. “Life safety only!”

His officers surged forward through the smoke. Tear gas blooms like white fire. Visibility collapsed to ten feet. The air was a choking mix of propellant and concrete dust. Radios sputtered. Every doorway looked like danger.

Herrera ducked under a shattered window frame as his team pulled civilians from the stairwell — a woman clutching her son to her chest, an elderly man staggering down each step like a drunk, eyes streaming from the gas. Two ICE agents dragged a wounded colleague toward the curb, their faces pale behind visors now splattered with blood and debris.

A drone crashed nearby, its propellers spinning uselessly before the motor whines out. Sparks jumped from a disabled ICE vehicle whose windshield was spiderwebbed with bullet holes. Someone shouted for medics, another for a shield, another for water. No one heard them.

Herrera’s headset filled with half-words and static. “ — movement — two o’clock — lost signal — ” The digital map in his visor collapsed into warning glyphs: CONNECTIVITY LOSS. SENSOR JAM DETECTED. He rips it off.

Through the gray, shapes stumbled past him — federal uniforms, city uniforms, civilians, all indistinguishable. Lines of command dissolved in seconds.

For a moment, no one is federal, no one is local. There are only people breathing smoke and fear in the same hallway, trying not to become the next silhouette on someone’s feed.

The Street War of Narratives

Within minutes, the Resistance channels exploded online. Edited clips show ICE agents firing into smoke, a civilian bleeding on the pavement, and Guard vehicles idling behind them like silent sentinels. The captions call it a “federal massacre.”

ICE released their own footage — thermal stills of masked attackers throwing projectiles, the burned-out shell of a drone, and a shot of an officer being dragged to safety. They label it a terrorist ambush.

Both stories spread faster than the facts can follow.

City Hall issued a sterile statement: “The Chicago Police Department provided no assistance in immigration enforcement operations and intervened only to preserve life and safety.”

It satisfied no one.

To The Resistance, CPD is complicit by proximity. To the feds, they are cowardly and disloyal. To Herrera, they are simply lost in the middle — trying to keep a fragile peace while the world fractures around them.

And somewhere online, The Resistance released a new video. It ended with a simple phrase that chills Herrera more than any explosion:

“They cannot save both law and people. So they must choose.”

The Aftermath (Revised)

The aftermath came in waves — official, political, and human. None of them bring calm.

By nightfall, the air around the apartment complex still tasted of smoke and ozone. Floodlights swept over the scene as federal and local units worked shoulder to shoulder, neither looking at the other for too long. Every piece of debris became evidence. Footage from every body camera became a potential indictment. And every silence felt heavier than any gunfire that came before it.

Within twenty-four hours, the city was a battlefield of stories. The Resistance released a montage before the first official press conference even begins: ICE agents in formation, tear gas clouds curling through the street, civilians screaming in distorted slow motion. Over it, a voice — calm, clear, and eerily confident — delivered a new manifesto:

“You have built a nation that promotes fear instead of justice. When fear breaks, justice will burn with it.”

The clip goes viral within hours. To their followers, it’s a warning. To law enforcement, it’s a declaration of war.

By morning, the federal government answered in kind. DHS officials stood beside Marine and National Guard officers in crisp uniforms and promised “decisive action against extremist actors.” Reporters used words like domestic insurgency and urban terrorism. The President delivered a statement that sidestepped legality but crackled with finality: “Federal authority will not bend to those who traffic in fear.”

The next day, convoys of military vehicles rolled into staging zones on the city’s south side — officially for “communications support.” In practice, they looked and moved like a military deployment. The Supreme Court has not yet ruled on the legality of using active-duty soldiers for immigration-related operations, but their presence alone redraws psychological lines across the city.

As the CPD’s Incident Commander, Herrera attended the emergency coordination meeting in City Hall. Around the table sat ICE supervisors, federal legal advisors, US Marine and the now-federalized state guard liaisons, and the mayor’s chief counsel. The air smelled of burned coffee and panic. Each faction spoke in absolutes: “We can’t lose control of the narrative.” “We must demonstrate strength.” “We cannot be seen as weak.”

When Herrera finally spoke, his voice was quieter than he intended. “Strength is not what stops cities from breaking,” he said. “Trust is.”

No one answered him. They’d already moved on to their predetermined talking points.

In the streets, the mood changed overnight. Patrol officers found themselves cursed at by one crowd and thanked by another — sometimes on the same block. Resistance symbols — small red triangles painted near intersections — began to appear more frequently, almost like a language spreading. Drones buzzed above rallies and are shot out of the sky.

Inside ICE headquarters, new operational guidelines circulated — heavier security, broader surveillance permissions, “heightened readiness posture.” To Herrera, it looked like the quiet beginning of a low-level domestic conflict: small attacks, visible security, and the slow erosion of moral restraint.

When the press finally moved on to the next crisis, the tension didn’t fade; it fermented. CPD officers started finding printed leaflets slipped under their windshield wipers, each bearing the same line from The Resistance broadcast:

“When fear breaks, justice will burn.”

Herrera kept one of them folded in his desk drawer, beside his badge. He didn’t know why. Maybe as a reminder. Maybe as a warning.

He knew what comes next won’t be smaller — it will be smarter, faster, and harder to stop. The Resistance was evolving. Getting smarter, more effective. And they were gaining support. The lines have been drawn so many times they no longer mark boundaries. They mark scars.

The Commander’s Reflection

Weeks later, Herrera drove past the ruins of the complex. The street had been scrubbed clean, but the echoes remained. A teddy bear tied to a fence. Spray-painted slogans fading under rain. Parts of an officer’s broken body camera embedded in the asphalt.

He knew how history will remember this — if it remembers it at all. The lawyers will debate legality; the pundits will talk strategy; the activists will tell it as a story of martyrdom or resistance. But to him, it was another night where trust evaporated faster than the smoke.

He once believed policing was about drawing bright lines — lawful and unlawful, right and wrong, protect and serve. Now he knows the truth: in America 2030, every line glows for a moment and then burns away.

Author’s Note

The Resistance is inspired by the daily news stories about ICE activities and increasing pushback by communities and state and local elected leaders. It is a cautionary story about the fragility of trust in a nation pulling itself apart. It imagines a near-future Chicago where local police find themselves trapped between federal enforcement and a growing domestic movement that believes rebellion is moral. The story explores how immigration enforcement — once a bureaucratic task — has become a cultural and political fault line, dividing communities, cities, and even police departments themselves.

The idea of multi-domain coordination — where military, intelligence, and law enforcement systems operate in shared digital space — comes directly from emerging real-world models of joint operations. In these systems, power moves faster than accountability, and decisions become automated before they are debated. The result is a landscape where legality and legitimacy don’t always meet, and where local police are left to manage the fallout of national politics on neighborhood streets.

At its heart, The Resistance is about the erosion of trust — between agencies, between officers and citizens, and between the law and the people it’s meant to serve. As America fragments under the weight of ideology, fear, and controversial policy, the story asks whether policing can remain a stabilizing force — or whether it, too, will fracture along the same fault lines.

Reflective Questions

1. When local law prohibits assisting federal agencies, how can police commanders protect life and maintain legitimacy without being seen as betraying either side?

2. How should law enforcement handle extremist movements that blend humanitarian aid with violent factions — distinguishing between activism and terrorism without collapsing both into one?

3. What constitutional or ethical limits should exist on military “support roles” in domestic law enforcement operations?

4. How might local police rebuild trust with communities when every violent encounter becomes both a battlefield and a broadcast?

5. What future policing frameworks could prevent America’s next “Bright Lines” — where laws, loyalties, and lives collide in the same city block?

To download a printer-friendly version of the story, click here.

To read Jim Bueermann’s bio, click here.